Tumarkin v. Friedman
88 A.2d 39, 9 N.J. 287
This text of 88 A.2d 39 (Tumarkin v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tumarkin v. Friedman, 88 A.2d 39, 9 N.J. 287 (N.J. 1952).
Opinion
ALLAN L. TUMARKIN, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER,
v.
ADOLPH FRIEDMAN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Messrs. Sandles & Sandles and Mr. Joseph J. Schotland for the petitioner.
Messrs. Gross & Gross for the respondent.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Donnelly v. Ritzendollar
101 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1953)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
88 A.2d 39, 9 N.J. 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tumarkin-v-friedman-nj-1952.