Tulsa Hotel v. Sparks
This text of 1946 OK 305 (Tulsa Hotel v. Sparks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a proceeding by the Tulsa Hotel et al., petitioner, to review an award made by the State Industrial Commission in favor of S. C. Sparks. The order from which the proceeding is prosecuted was entered July 31, 1946. The secretary of the State Industrial Commission certified that a copy of said order was sent to the parties affected on August 1, 1946. A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the cross-petition of S. C. Sparks was not filed until August 22, 1946. The motion to dismiss must be sustained. In Hurley v. State Highway Commission, 186 Okla. 79, 96 P. 2d 301, we held that under the provisions of 85 O. S. 1941, §29, an original proceeding to vacate an award of the State Industrial Commission must be commenced within 20 days after a copy of such award or decision has been sent by the commission to the parties affected. The filing of a cross-petition in error is a new proceeding, and in order to maintain the errors alleged in any such cross-petition it is necessary to comply with the statutory provisions with relation to petitions in error. Board of County Commissioners of Kiowa County v. Kiowa National Bank, 166 Okla. 255, 27 P. 2d 338.
The cross-petition in error of S. C. Sparks is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1946 OK 305, 174 P.2d 920, 197 Okla. 644, 1946 Okla. LEXIS 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tulsa-hotel-v-sparks-okla-1946.