Tullytown Boro v. Armstrong, E.

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 6, 2016
Docket121 MAL 2016
StatusPublished

This text of Tullytown Boro v. Armstrong, E. (Tullytown Boro v. Armstrong, E.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tullytown Boro v. Armstrong, E., (Pa. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

TULLYTOWN BOROUGH, : No. 121 MAL 2016 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v. : : : EDWARD ARMSTRONG, ROBERT : CAMPANARO, EDWARD CZYZYK, AND : GEORGE FOX, : : Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tullytown Boro v. Armstrong, E., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tullytown-boro-v-armstrong-e-pa-2016.