Tully v. Town of North Hempstead

93 A.D.2d 834, 461 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17683
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 11, 1983·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Town of North Hemp-stead (the town) appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Velsor, J.), dated September 23, 1982, which denied its motion for leave to serve an amended answer. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff. Plaintiff has alleged, inter alia, that he was injured as the result of the town’s failure to properly regulate traffic at the intersection where the accident occurred. Under these circumstances, plaintiff was not required to comply with the notice requirements of section 65-a of the Town Law and section 26-1 of the North Hempstead Code (see Doremus v Incorporated Vil. of Lynbrook, 18 NY2d 362; see, also, Sharapata v Town oflslip, 82 AD2d 350, 362, affd 56 NY2d 332). Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tully v. Town of North Hempstead, 93 A.D.2d 834, 461 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17683 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

93 A.D.2d 834 (Tully v. Town of North Hempstead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alexander v. Eldred
100 A.D.2d 666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
De Francisci v. Baron
97 A.D.2d 453 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)