Tully v. Roosevelt Properties, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tully v. Roosevelt Properties, Inc.

34 A.D.2d 786, 311 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4988

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 4, 1970

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 34 A.D.2d 786 (Tully v. Roosevelt Properties, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tully v. Roosevelt Properties, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 786, 311 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4988 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant and third-party plaintiff Joseph Bisceglia & Sons, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered May 19, 1969 after a jury trial upon the issues of liability only, as (1) adjudged it liable to plaintiff, upon the jury’s verdict, and (2) dismissed its third-party complaint against third-party defendant, South Shore Brick Masons, Inc., upon decision of the trial court. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to respondents jointly. Appellant was the general contractor engaged to construct a department store in Westbury, Long Island. Plaintiff was in the employ of the third-party defendant, a subcontractor engaged by appellant to assist it in the project. Plaintiff testified that on the morning of December 4, 1962, the date of the accident in which he was injured, he was directed by appellant’s superintendent in charge of the project to use a designated well wheel and rope for hoisting cinder blocks up the elevator shaft. The well wheel and rope were attached to the ceiling of the shaft. While he was working on the second story of the structure, hoisting cinder blocks up the elevator shaft with the well wheel and rope, the rope, which was in his hand, came apart at a point above his head where it had been knotted. Plaintiff and the cinder blocks were catapulted down the open elevator shaft to its bottom—a distance of about 15 feet. The case was submitted to the jury on the issue whether appellant, as the general contractor, had violated [787]*787subdivision 1 of section 240 of the Labor Law in directing plaintiff to perform the hoisting work with defective equipment. In our opinion, this question was properly submitted to the jury and the jury’s verdict was supported by the evidence (cf. Sarnoff v. Charles Schad, Inc., 22 N Y 2d 180; Koenig v. Patrick Constr. Corp., 298 N. Y. 313; Galbraith v. Pike & Son, 18 A D 2d 39). The' third-party complaint was properly dismissed since appellant’s duty under the above-mentioned provision of the Labor Law to furnish plaintiff with safe equipment in the performance of the directed work was nondelegable. Its violation of that statute, as found by the jury, constituted affirmative negligence. Thus, it had no claim over against the third-party defendant on the theory that the latter owned the well wheel and rope (cf. Rufo v. Orlando, 309 N. Y. 345, 350). Christ, P. J., Hopkins, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur. (Beldock, P. J., deceased.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant and third-party plaintiff Joseph Bisceglia & Sons, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered May 19, 1969 after a jury trial upon the issues of liability only, as (1) adjudged it liable to plaintiff, upon the jury’s verdict, and (2) dismissed its third-party complaint against third-party defendant, South Shore Brick Masons, Inc., upon decision of the trial court. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to respondents jointly. Appellant was the general contractor engaged to construct a department store in Westbury, Long Island. Plaintiff was in the employ of the third-party defendant, a subcontractor engaged by appellant to assist it in the project. Plaintiff testified that on the morning of December 4, 1962, the date of the accident in which he was injured, he was directed by appellant’s superintendent in charge of the project to use a designated well wheel and rope for hoisting cinder blocks up the elevator shaft. The well wheel and rope were attached to the ceiling of the shaft. While he was working on the second story of the structure, hoisting cinder blocks up the elevator shaft with the well wheel and rope, the rope, which was in his hand, came apart at a point above his head where it had been knotted. Plaintiff and the cinder blocks were catapulted down the open elevator shaft to its bottom—a distance of about 15 feet. The case was submitted to the jury on the issue whether appellant, as the general contractor, had violated [787]*787subdivision 1 of section 240 of the Labor Law in directing plaintiff to perform the hoisting work with defective equipment. In our opinion, this question was properly submitted to the jury and the jury’s verdict was supported by the evidence (cf. Sarnoff v. Charles Schad, Inc., 22 N Y 2d 180; Koenig v. Patrick Constr. Corp., 298 N. Y. 313; Galbraith v. Pike & Son, 18 A D 2d 39). The' third-party complaint was properly dismissed since appellant’s duty under the above-mentioned provision of the Labor Law to furnish plaintiff with safe equipment in the performance of the directed work was nondelegable. Its violation of that statute, as found by the jury, constituted affirmative negligence. Thus, it had no claim over against the third-party defendant on the theory that the latter owned the well wheel and rope (cf. Rufo v. Orlando, 309 N. Y. 345, 350). Christ, P. J., Hopkins, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur. (Beldock, P. J., deceased.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 786, 311 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tully-v-roosevelt-properties-inc-nyappdiv-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack