Tully v. Manneschmidt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tully v. Manneschmidt

176 A.D. 930

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 176 A.D. 930 (Tully v. Manneschmidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tully v. Manneschmidt, 176 A.D. 930 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the complaint fails to state a cause of action, unless plaintiff serve an amended complaint within twenty days which shall allege facts showing a valid cause of action, which he is permitted to do upon payment of ten dollars costs.

Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the complaint fails to state a cause of action, unless plaintiff serve an amended complaint within twenty days which shall allege facts showing a valid cause of action, which he is permitted to do upon payment of ten dollars costs.

Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 A.D. 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tully-v-manneschmidt-nyappdiv-1917.