Tulloh v. Goodyear Atomic Corp.

588 N.E.2d 132, 63 Ohio St. 3d 1433, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 492

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tulloh v. Goodyear Atomic Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 62 Ohio St. 3d 541 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 25, 1992·No. 90-2149·Published

Opinion

Pike County, No. 449. Reported at 62 Ohio St.3d 541, 584 N.E.2d 729. On motion for rehearing. Rehearing denied.

Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent. H. Brown, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tulloh v. Goodyear Atomic Corp., 588 N.E.2d 132, 63 Ohio St. 3d 1433, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 492 (Ohio 1992).

Pincite

588 N.E.2d 132 (Tulloh v. Goodyear Atomic Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

584 N.E.2d 729 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1992)