Tullius v. Division of Highways

West Virginia Court of Claims

Tullius v. Division of Highways

20 Ct. Cl. 24

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedAugust 26, 1993

DocketCC-93-6

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ct. Cl. 24 (Tullius v. Division of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tullius v. Division of Highways, 20 Ct. Cl. 24 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Claimant, Matthew A. Tullius, seeks an award of $736.90 from the Division of Highways for property damage sustained while driving his vehicle on October 30,1992 at 11:30 p.m. on West Virginia Route 2 in Waverly, Wood County.

From the evidence adduced at the hearing on May 5,1993, it appears that the claimant was driving his 1992 Eagle Talon north on Route 2 at approximately 55 miles per hour with his brother-in-law as a passenger when he noticed an oncoming vehicle approaching left of the center line. The claimant attempted to avoid a head-on collision by driving his vehicle onto the berm on the right-hand side of the road. This area is a part of the entrance to a gravel parking lot for the High Chapparal (a local bar). The entrance to the parking lot abuts Route 2 on the State’s right-of-way. When his vehicle went onto this area, it went into an eight to twelve inch deep hole where the gravel had been washed away. Claimant’s vehicle sustained damage and the cost to repair the vehicle is in the amount of $736.90. The claimant did not turn this damage into his insurance company. The amount of the claimant’s deductible is $500.00.

Paul Reese, county supervisor for the respondent, testified that he is familiar with the scene of the accident and that the respondent had received complaints of the defective condition of the area on prior occasions. However, he also stated that he is of the opinion that it is the property owner’s responsibility to keep the driveway properly maintained, he had previously notified the [25]*25owner of the High Chapparal that the driveway was in need of repair, he is of the opinion that this defective area is not the responsibility of the respondent. However, respondent failed to carry out the enforcement of W. Va. Code §17-16-9, which requires owners of land fronting any State road to keep the area properly maintained.

The Court finds, after reviewing the record, that the respondent had actual notice of the defective condition on the berm and that the respondent failed to maintain the berm area or to enforce the appropriate statutes as to the maintenance of driveways which abut State roads. In an emergency situation, the driver of a vehicle relies upon the berm area of a road to be in good repair. In this claim, the claimant has established negligence on the part of the respondent by a preponderance of the evidence.

Therefore, the Court is of the opinion to make an award to the claimant for the damage to his vehicle limited to the amount of his deductible on his insurance policy of $500.00.

Award of $500.00.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Claimant, Matthew A. Tullius, seeks an award of $736.90 from the Division of Highways for property damage sustained while driving his vehicle on October 30,1992 at 11:30 p.m. on West Virginia Route 2 in Waverly, Wood County.

From the evidence adduced at the hearing on May 5,1993, it appears that the claimant was driving his 1992 Eagle Talon north on Route 2 at approximately 55 miles per hour with his brother-in-law as a passenger when he noticed an oncoming vehicle approaching left of the center line. The claimant attempted to avoid a head-on collision by driving his vehicle onto the berm on the right-hand side of the road. This area is a part of the entrance to a gravel parking lot for the High Chapparal (a local bar). The entrance to the parking lot abuts Route 2 on the State’s right-of-way. When his vehicle went onto this area, it went into an eight to twelve inch deep hole where the gravel had been washed away. Claimant’s vehicle sustained damage and the cost to repair the vehicle is in the amount of $736.90. The claimant did not turn this damage into his insurance company. The amount of the claimant’s deductible is $500.00.

Paul Reese, county supervisor for the respondent, testified that he is familiar with the scene of the accident and that the respondent had received complaints of the defective condition of the area on prior occasions. However, he also stated that he is of the opinion that it is the property owner’s responsibility to keep the driveway properly maintained, he had previously notified the [25]*25owner of the High Chapparal that the driveway was in need of repair, he is of the opinion that this defective area is not the responsibility of the respondent. However, respondent failed to carry out the enforcement of W. Va. Code §17-16-9, which requires owners of land fronting any State road to keep the area properly maintained.

The Court finds, after reviewing the record, that the respondent had actual notice of the defective condition on the berm and that the respondent failed to maintain the berm area or to enforce the appropriate statutes as to the maintenance of driveways which abut State roads. In an emergency situation, the driver of a vehicle relies upon the berm area of a road to be in good repair. In this claim, the claimant has established negligence on the part of the respondent by a preponderance of the evidence.

Therefore, the Court is of the opinion to make an award to the claimant for the damage to his vehicle limited to the amount of his deductible on his insurance policy of $500.00.

Award of $500.00.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Ct. Cl. 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tullius-v-division-of-highways-wvctcl-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack