Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Tullis v. State

Tullis v. State

52 S.W. 83, 41 Tex. Crim. 87, 1899 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 141
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 21, 1899·No. No. 1976.·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary. We have carefully read this record, as well as the briefs filed by both parties. The brief of the Assistant Attorney-General fully presents the statement of the case, and discusses the question involved in the appeal and the law applicable thereto. It accords with our view of the law applicable to that issue, and is a very elaborate and able exposition of the law involved in this appeal. We therefore adopt the brief of the Assistant Attorney-General as the opinion of the court in this case. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tullis v. State, 52 S.W. 83, 41 Tex. Crim. 87, 1899 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 141 (Tex. 1899).

52 S.W. 83 (Tullis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Graham v. State
994 S.W.2d 651 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Austin v. State
183 N.W.2d 56 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1971)
State v. Hingle
139 So. 2d 205 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1962)
Ex Parte Muncy
163 S.W. 29 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Scribner v. State
1913 OK CR 131 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1913)
Ex Parte Isbell
87 S.W. 145 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1905)
Whitten v. State
86 S.W. 1134 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1905)
Young v. State
75 S.W. 23 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1903)