Tullis v. State
817 So. 2d 1079, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7979, 2002 WL 1233874
Opinion
Michael Tullís challenges the order of the trial court denying his motion for jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm without prejudice to Tullis’s right to file a facially sufficient motion, if he is able to do [1080] so, pursuant to Whitt v. State, 807 So.2d 788 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tullis v. State, 817 So. 2d 1079, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7979, 2002 WL 1233874 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
817 So. 2d 1079 (Tullis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whitt v. State
807 So. 2d 788 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)