Tullis v. State

817 So. 2d 1079, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7979, 2002 WL 1233874
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 7, 2002
DocketNo. 2D02-1029
StatusPublished

This text of 817 So. 2d 1079 (Tullis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tullis v. State, 817 So. 2d 1079, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7979, 2002 WL 1233874 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Tullís challenges the order of the trial court denying his motion for jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm without prejudice to Tullis’s right to file a facially sufficient motion, if he is able to do [1080]*1080so, pursuant to Whitt v. State, 807 So.2d 788 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

Affirmed.

GREEN, DAVIS, and KELLY, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitt v. State
807 So. 2d 788 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
817 So. 2d 1079, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7979, 2002 WL 1233874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tullis-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.