TULLIS v. KNIGHT

District Court, S.D. Indiana·Decided August 12, 2021·No. 1:21-cv-00168·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

JEFFREY TULLIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:21-cv-00168-TWP-TAB ) WENDY KNIGHT, et al. ) ) Defendants. )

Order Screening Complaint and Directing Issuance and Service of Process Plaintiff Jeffrey Tullis, an inmate at the Correctional Industrial Facility, brings this civil rights action alleging that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his health and safety, with the result that he contracted Covid-19. The complaint is now ready for screening. I. Screening Standard

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), the Court must dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if it is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim for relief, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. In determining whether the complaint states a claim, the Court applies the same standard as when addressing a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). See Cesal v. Moats, 851 F.3d 714, 720 (7th Cir. 2017). For the complaint to survive dismissal, it "must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face. A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged." Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). II. The Complaint The complaint names three defendants: (1) Warden Wendy Knight; (2) Major Fox; and (3) Lieutenant Coates. In the complaint, Mr. Tullis alleges that two (non-inmate) kitchen staff members at

Correctional Industrial Facility tested positive for Covid-19 on November 10, 2020. The defendants took no precautionary measures to quarantine inmates who worked alongside these staff members. On November 13, 2020, three inmates who had been in contact with the infected kitchen staff members began showing symptoms of the virus. The three inmates, who all lived in Mr. Tullis's housing unit, were quarantined beginning November 14, 2020. On November 18, 2020, the defendants decided to sanitize Mr. Tullis's housing unit. Around 3:30 p.m., they moved 126 inmates from this housing unit to the dining room. The inmates were not screened for Covid-19 symptoms before this move. The dining room was too small for 126 inmates to maintain six feet of distance from each other. While the 126 inmates were in the

dining room, one became ill. This inmate was later confirmed to have Covid-19. The inmates were taken back to their housing unit around 9:15 p.m. On November 19, 2020, Mr. Tullis began showing symptoms of Covid-19. He has since experienced fever, body pain, chest pain, breathing problems, vision problems, loss of taste and smell, "urination issues," muscle weakness, and headaches. Mr. Tullis alleges that the defendants' actions were deliberately indifferent in violation of the Eighth Amendment and negligent under Indiana law. He seeks damages and declaratory relief. iI. Discussion Mr. Tullis's Eighth Amendment claims against all defendants shall proceed based on allegations that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his health and safety. His state-law negligence claims also shall proceed. IV. Issuance and Service of Process The clerk is directed to issue process to defendants (1) Wendy Knight; (2) Major Fox; and (3) Lt. Coates. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, dkt. [1], applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: _ 8/12/2021 ( Na, 1 a \ atta Lircatt Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, Chief Judge United States District Court oe, Southern District of Indiana Distribution: JEFFREY TULLIS PENDLETON - CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIAL FACILITY CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIAL FACILITY Inmate Mail/Parcels 5124 West Reformatory Road PENDLETON, IN 46064 Electronic service to Indiana Department of Correction employees at Correctional Industrial Facility: Wendy Knight Major Fox Lieutenant Coates

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TULLIS v. KNIGHT, (S.D. Ind. 2021).

TULLIS v. KNIGHT (TULLIS v. KNIGHT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Cesal v. Moats
851 F.3d 714 (Seventh Circuit, 2017)