Tullett & Tokyo Forex, Inc. v. Linker

226 A.D.2d 182, 641 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3748
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 11, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered on or about [183]*183October 23, 1995, which, in an action to recover loans that defendant claims were forgiven, denied plaintiffs motion for the production of defendant’s income tax returns, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that, at this stage of the proceedings, plaintiff has failed to overcome the presumptive right of confidentiality accorded tax returns with a " 'strong showing of overriding necessity’ ” (Editel, N Y. v Liberty Studios, 162 AD2d 345, 346), including what the returns might prove and inability to obtain the information from any alternative source (Consentino v Schwartz, 155 AD2d 640, 641). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tullett & Tokyo Forex, Inc. v. Linker, 226 A.D.2d 182, 641 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3748 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

226 A.D.2d 182 (Tullett & Tokyo Forex, Inc. v. Linker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodriguez v. City of New York
142 A.D.3d 778 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)