Tull v. Florida Unemployment Commission
This text of 695 So. 2d 497 (Tull v. Florida Unemployment Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because the Unemployment Appeals Commission impermissibly substituted its judgment for that of the fact-finder, the order denying 'unemployment benefits must be reversed and the cause remanded with directions that benefits be awarded. See Scardino v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 603 So.2d 549 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Accord Clay County Sheriff’s Office v. Loos, 570 So.2d 394 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Shackleton v. [498]*498Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 534 So.2d 753 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
695 So. 2d 497, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6291, 1997 WL 312107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tull-v-florida-unemployment-commission-fladistctapp-1997.