Tulip v. Andrews

Supreme Court of Kansas

Tulip v. Andrews

95 P. 1135, 77 Kan. 862, 1908 Kan. LEXIS 370

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedApril 11, 1908

DocketNo. 15,473

StatusPublished

This text of 95 P. 1135 (Tulip v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tulip v. Andrews, 95 P. 1135, 77 Kan. 862, 1908 Kan. LEXIS 370 (kan 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Did the plaintiff convey the real estate involved in this controversy to defendant under an agreement, express or implied, that the latter would hold it in trust for the former? Upon this, the controlling question in the case, the burden was upon plaintiff. The testimony of the parties was conflicting, and upon what appears to be sufficient evidence the trial court found in favor of the- defendant. This finding is conclusive in this court, and is an end of the controversy.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Did the plaintiff convey the real estate involved in this controversy to defendant under an agreement, express or implied, that the latter would hold it in trust for the former? Upon this, the controlling question in the case, the burden was upon plaintiff. The testimony of the parties was conflicting, and upon what appears to be sufficient evidence the trial court found in favor of the- defendant. This finding is conclusive in this court, and is an end of the controversy.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 P. 1135, 77 Kan. 862, 1908 Kan. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tulip-v-andrews-kan-1908.