Tulingan v. Brown
This text of 10 Vet. App. 43 (Tulingan v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
On October 24, 1996, a panel of the Court affirmed the Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision on appeal. Tulingan v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 484 (1996). On December 17, 1996, the Court granted the appellant’s motion for an extension of time, until December 31, 1996, to file a motion for review en banc. On January 8, 1997, the appellant filed a motion for review by the Court en bane, out of time.
Upon consideration of the foregoing, the record on appeal, and the appellant’s motion for review en banc, and it not appearing that review en banc is necessary either to address a question of exceptional importance to the administration of laws affecting veterans’ benefits or to secure or maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions, it is
ORDERED that the motion for en banc review is accepted for filing as of the date of this order. It is further
ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for review by the Court en banc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Vet. App. 43, 1997 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 91, 1997 WL 35191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tulingan-v-brown-cavc-1997.