Tulane Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Singer Lumber Co.
Opinion
Defendant-appellant, in application for rehearing, complains of the fact that in our decree we did not reserve to him the right to obtain possession of the merchandise which formed the basis of the suit upon payment by him of the amount of the judgment rendered against him.
No such reservation in the decree is necessai'y. The amount of the decree is the purchase price of the articles, and, obviously, when the amount thereof is paid, defendant will be entitled to possession of the articles for which he will then have paid the purchase price.
The application for rehearing is refused.
Reheáring refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
169 So. 100 (Tulane Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Singer Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.