Tulalip Tribes Prosecutor v. Hammons

Tulalip Court of Appeals

Tulalip Tribes Prosecutor v. Hammons

8 Am. Tribal Law 385

CourtTulalip Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 25, 2010

DocketNo. TUL-CV-GA-2009-0381

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Am. Tribal Law 385 (Tulalip Tribes Prosecutor v. Hammons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tulalip Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tulalip Tribes Prosecutor v. Hammons, 8 Am. Tribal Law 385 (tulalipctapp 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

JANE M. SMITH, Chief Justice.

This matter comes before the Tulalip Tribal Court of Appeals upon the filing of a Notice of Appeal on November 20, 2009. Appellant alleges that the Court erred when it refused to revoke Appellee’s gaming license.

JURISDICTION

The Court of Appeals does not have authority to hear this matter pursuant to Ordinance 55 of the Tulalip Law & Order Code. Ordinance 55, Section 4.e.l3 states

Decision, (a) The decision of the Tribal Gaming Court shall be in writing, shall state the reasons for the decision, and shall be final and not subject to further appeal to the Tulalip Tribal Court of Appeals or otherwise. Emphasis added.

Appellant has not shown cause for this Court to declare an exception to this law.

ORDER

We decline to accept this case for review' and Dismiss the Appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI