Tukes v. State
This text of 434 So. 2d 39 (Tukes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant seeks review of his conviction and sentence for the offense of grand theft. We do not address the contention that Fla. [40]*40Const. Art. I, § 12, and Swartz v. State, 316 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), cert. denied, 333 So.2d 465 (Fla.1976), require that an arrest warrant issue only upon a sworn written statement of probable cause. The circumstances of the present case permit a warrantless arrest pursuant to § 901.15(2), Florida Statutes, and any error in the issuance of the arrest warrant would therefore be harmless.
The order appealed is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
434 So. 2d 39, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tukes-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.