Tuifao v. Lafitoga
This text of 1 Am. Samoa 418 (Tuifao v. Lafitoga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering High Court of American Samoa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JUDGMENT
The above case came on to be heard before the High Court, with Judges Foxall, Lutu and Pele sitting, at Leone, [419]*419Tutuila, American Samoa at 10:00 A.M. of March 21, 1929.
The court inquired as to whether or not the parties to the controversy had been able to reach an agreement as to who should hold the Matai Name “Pule.”
Pule, representing Fafitoga and Tuifao, acting as his own counsel, both requested the court to dismiss the case without decision.
It is therefore adjudged and decreed that the within case, to determine the right of Lafitoga to register the Matai Name “Pule,” be dismissed and it is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Am. Samoa 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuifao-v-lafitoga-amsamoa-1929.