Tuggle v. State

38 S.E. 830, 113 Ga. 272, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 225
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 24, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 38 S.E. 830 (Tuggle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tuggle v. State, 38 S.E. 830, 113 Ga. 272, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 225 (Ga. 1901).

Opinion

Little, J.

1. The exceptions assigning as error the failure of the trial judge to give in charge to the jury certain recited principles of law, which it was claimed were material and applicable to the evidence in the case, can not be sustained. The general charge sufficiently dealt with the principles of law specified, in the absence of a request for more specific instructions.

2. The evidence fully warranted the verdict as to both of the defendants, and the trial judge committed no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. Foster & Butler and T. J. Galloway, for plaintiffs in error. J. M. Terrell, attorney-general, and C. H. Brand, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wyatt v. State
57 S.E.2d 914 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 S.E. 830, 113 Ga. 272, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuggle-v-state-ga-1901.