Tug Hill Construction, Inc. v. Dufferin Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tug Hill Construction, Inc. v. Dufferin Construction Co.

41 A.D.3d 1313, 836 N.Y.S.2d 457

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.D.3d 1313 (Tug Hill Construction, Inc. v. Dufferin Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tug Hill Construction, Inc. v. Dufferin Construction Co., 41 A.D.3d 1313, 836 N.Y.S.2d 457 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from [1314]*1314an order of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (Hugh A. Gilbert, J.), entered April 6, 2006 in a breach of contract action. The order, among other things, denied the motion of defendant Dufferin Construction Company, a Division of St. Lawrence Cement, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it and denied the cross motion of plaintiff for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability against that defendant.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated in the decision at Suprime Court. Present— Scudder, P.J, Centra, Lunn, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from [1314]*1314an order of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (Hugh A. Gilbert, J.), entered April 6, 2006 in a breach of contract action. The order, among other things, denied the motion of defendant Dufferin Construction Company, a Division of St. Lawrence Cement, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it and denied the cross motion of plaintiff for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability against that defendant.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated in the decision at Suprime Court. Present— Scudder, P.J, Centra, Lunn, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.3d 1313, 836 N.Y.S.2d 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tug-hill-construction-inc-v-dufferin-construction-co-nyappdiv-2007.