Tufts v. Waxman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Tufts v. Waxman

63 N.E. 132, 181 Mass. 120, 1902 Mass. LEXIS 799

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMarch 26, 1902

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 63 N.E. 132 (Tufts v. Waxman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tufts v. Waxman, 63 N.E. 132, 181 Mass. 120, 1902 Mass. LEXIS 799 (Mass. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Holmes, O. J.

If the report of the justice of the Superior Court is properly before us, there is nothing in it to show that his discretion was wrongly exercised in denying the defendant leave to amend. There is no appeal. Therefore, whether the report is properly before us or not, the decree of the Superior Court must stand. The motion for double costs is overruled, as it is at least doubtful whether the statute can be extended to cover this case. R. L. c. 156, § 13.

Decree to stand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes, O. J.

If the report of the justice of the Superior Court is properly before us, there is nothing in it to show that his discretion was wrongly exercised in denying the defendant leave to amend. There is no appeal. Therefore, whether the report is properly before us or not, the decree of the Superior Court must stand. The motion for double costs is overruled, as it is at least doubtful whether the statute can be extended to cover this case. R. L. c. 156, § 13.

Decree to stand.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 N.E. 132, 181 Mass. 120, 1902 Mass. LEXIS 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tufts-v-waxman-mass-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack