Tufts v. Waxman

63 N.E. 132, 181 Mass. 120, 1902 Mass. LEXIS 799
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 26, 1902·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Holmes, O. J.

If the report of the justice of the Superior Court is properly before us, there is nothing in it to show that his discretion was wrongly exercised in denying the defendant leave to amend. There is no appeal. Therefore, whether the report is properly before us or not, the decree of the Superior Court must stand. The motion for double costs is overruled, as it is at least doubtful whether the statute can be extended to cover this case. R. L. c. 156, § 13.

Decree to stand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tufts v. Waxman, 63 N.E. 132, 181 Mass. 120, 1902 Mass. LEXIS 799 (Mass. 1902).

63 N.E. 132 (Tufts v. Waxman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Calkins v. Wire Hardware Co.
165 N.E. 889 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)
Reno v. Cotter
236 Mass. 556 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)