Tufts v. Corporation of Lloyd's

Second Circuit

Tufts v. Corporation of Lloyd's

128 F.3d 793, 1997 WL 695306

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 10, 1997·No. No. 215, Docket 96-9262·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

J. David Tufts III and the Estate of James D. Tufts II appeal from Judge Keenan’s dismissal of their Rule 60(b) action for relief from the judgment in Roby v. Corporation of Lloyd’s, 824 F.Supp. 336 (S.D.N.Y.1992), aff'd, 996 F.2d 1353 (2d Cir.1993). We affirm for substantially the .reasons stated by the district court. See Tufts v. Corporation of Lloyd’s, 1996 WL 533639 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 19, 1996).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

J. David Tufts III and the Estate of James D. Tufts II appeal from Judge Keenan’s dismissal of their Rule 60(b) action for relief from the judgment in Roby v. Corporation of Lloyd’s, 824 F.Supp. 336 (S.D.N.Y.1992), aff'd, 996 F.2d 1353 (2d Cir.1993). We affirm for substantially the .reasons stated by the district court. See Tufts v. Corporation of Lloyd’s, 1996 WL 533639 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 19, 1996).

Tufts v. Corporation of Lloyd's, 128 F.3d 793, 1997 WL 695306 (2d Cir. 1997).

Pincite

128 F.3d 793 (Tufts v. Corporation of Lloyd's) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related