Tuffs v. Gibbons

19 Wend. 639
New York Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1839·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Bronson, J.

Matter of defence which arises after issue joined should be pleaded at or before the time of the next continuance. But the court may in its discretion allow it to be pleaded, although one or more continuances have intervened. Morgan v. Dyer, 9 Johns. R. 255. 10 id. 161. In this case the accord which is pleaded was made between the defendant and the plaintiff’s attorney, after they both had notice that the demand had been assigned by the plaintiff to one Chapman. On the papers submitted it is a plain case of a fraudulent attempt to defeat the right of the assignee. The plea must therefore be set aside with costs.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tuffs v. Gibbons, 19 Wend. 639 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1839).

19 Wend. 639 (Tuffs v. Gibbons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rowell v. Hayden
40 Me. 582 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1885)
Morel v. Garelly
16 Abb. Pr. 269 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1863)
Hoyt v. Sheldon
4 Abb. Pr. 59 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1856)
Rangely v. Webster
11 N.H. 299 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1840)