Tuffs v. Gibbons
This text of 19 Wend. 639 (Tuffs v. Gibbons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court,
Matter of defence which arises after issue joined should be pleaded at or before the time of the next continuance. But the court may in its discretion allow it to be pleaded, although one or more continuances have intervened. Morgan v. Dyer, 9 Johns. R. 255. 10 id. 161. In this case the accord which is pleaded was made between the defendant and the plaintiff’s attorney, after they both had notice that the demand had been assigned by the plaintiff to one Chapman. On the papers submitted it is a plain case of a fraudulent attempt to defeat the right of the assignee. The plea must therefore be set aside with costs.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Wend. 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuffs-v-gibbons-nysupct-1839.