Tuffs v. Gibbons

19 Wend. 639
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1839
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 19 Wend. 639 (Tuffs v. Gibbons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tuffs v. Gibbons, 19 Wend. 639 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1839).

Opinion

By the Court,

Bronson, J.

Matter of defence which arises after issue joined should be pleaded at or before the time of the next continuance. But the court may in its discretion allow it to be pleaded, although one or more continuances have intervened. Morgan v. Dyer, 9 Johns. R. 255. 10 id. 161. In this case the accord which is pleaded was made between the defendant and the plaintiff’s attorney, after they both had notice that the demand had been assigned by the plaintiff to one Chapman. On the papers submitted it is a plain case of a fraudulent attempt to defeat the right of the assignee. The plea must therefore be set aside with costs.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rowell v. Hayden
40 Me. 582 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1885)
Morel v. Garelly
16 Abb. Pr. 269 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1863)
Hoyt v. Sheldon
4 Abb. Pr. 59 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1856)
Rangely v. Webster
11 N.H. 299 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1840)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Wend. 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuffs-v-gibbons-nysupct-1839.