Tuesca v. Rando MacHine Corp.
678 N.E.2d 497, 89 N.Y.2d 966, 655 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 4824
Opinion
*968 OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (226 AD2d 157).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tuesca v. Rando MacHine Corp., 678 N.E.2d 497, 89 N.Y.2d 966, 655 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 4824 (N.Y. 1997).
678 N.E.2d 497 (Tuesca v. Rando MacHine Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fernandez v. Mark Andy, Inc.
7 A.D.3d 484 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Valentin v. C.G. Bretting, Mfg., Co.
278 A.D.2d 230 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Eiss v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
275 A.D.2d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)