Tudela v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Tudela v. State

221 So. 2d 143, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2384

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 9, 1969·No. No. 37778·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

On further consideration of this cause following the granting of certiorari and oral argument, we have concluded that cer-tiorari was improvidently granted and that the writ heretofore issued should be, and is hereby, quashed.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur. THORNAL, J., concurs with opinion. DREW, J., dissents with opinion. ADKINS, J., dissents and concurs with DREW, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On further consideration of this cause following the granting of certiorari and oral argument, we have concluded that cer-tiorari was improvidently granted and that the writ heretofore issued should be, and is hereby, quashed.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur. THORNAL, J., concurs with opinion. DREW, J., dissents with opinion. ADKINS, J., dissents and concurs with DREW, J.

Tudela v. State, 221 So. 2d 143, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2384 (Fla. 1969).

Pincite

221 So. 2d 143 (Tudela v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related