Tuckman v. Tuckman

17 A.3d 1046, 301 Conn. 904, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 197
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 2, 2011
DocketSC 18786
StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.3d 1046 (Tuckman v. Tuckman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tuckman v. Tuckman, 17 A.3d 1046, 301 Conn. 904, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 197 (Colo. 2011).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 127 Conn. App. 417 (AC 30913), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court, having determined that the trial court’s child support order did not comply with the child support guidelines, properly invoke the mosaic rule to reverse all financial orders where it did not *905 consider the defendant’s challenges to the trial court’s orders concerning alimony, property and attorney’s fees?
Decided May 2, 2011 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18786. Daniel Jonah Krisch and Kenneth J. Bartschi, in support of the petition. Charles W. Fleischmann, in opposition.
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court failed to apply the child support guidelines when the defendant sought unallocated alimony and support, and failed to file the required child support guidelines worksheet?”
HARPER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tuckman v. Tuckman
14 A.3d 428 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 A.3d 1046, 301 Conn. 904, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuckman-v-tuckman-conn-2011.