Tuckfield v. Tuckfield

181 So. 2d 15
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 21, 1965
DocketNo. 65-333
StatusPublished

This text of 181 So. 2d 15 (Tuckfield v. Tuckfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tuckfield v. Tuckfield, 181 So. 2d 15 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sued appellee for divorce on the ground that she was guilty of constructive desertion in that her conduct caused him to move from' the marital home, and that he has remained away continually since 1962.

The chancellor heard the testimony of the parties on the issues raised by the complaint and answer and entered a final decree dis- • missing the complaint with prejudice on the ground that the plaintiff'failed to prove, grounds for divorce. Plaintiff filed a petition for rehearing which was denied. It is ' from the decree and order that plaintiff appeals.

We have carefully examined the record and briefs in this case and found no reason to reverse the chancellor. Therefore the decree and order appealed are affirmed. See Shippey v. Shippey, 97 Fla. 881, 122 So. 272 (1929); Gordon v. Gordon, Fla.1952, 59 So.2d 40.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gordon v. Gordon
59 So. 2d 40 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)
Shippey v. Shippey
122 So. 272 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 So. 2d 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuckfield-v-tuckfield-fladistctapp-1965.