Tucker's Will v. Admr. of Tucker's Estate

63 Vt. 104
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided October 15, 1890·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

TAFT, J.

After certain bequests, the testator gave to his sister, Diana, the use and occupancy of the residue of his estate, during her natural life, and at her decease, directed that it should then be distributed among his lawful heirs. At his death, his father, Ezra Tucker, was living and was his lawful heir. Ezra died before the decease of Diana, and the administrator of his estate claims the residue, as against the appellants, who were the lawful heirs, failing Ezra, at the time of Diana’s death. The words of the will ‘£ amongst my lawful heirs ” had reference to those persons who were the lawful heirs of the testator at the time of his death, not those who might be such at- the time of Diana’s death. No estate will be held contingent unless very decided terms are used in the will, or it is necessary to so hold in order to carry out the other provisions or implications of the will. Weatherhead v. Stoddard, 58 Vt. 623. We think the right'to the residue of the estate, vested at the time of the testator’s death, in his then heir, his father, Ezra Tucker, subject to the life estate of Diana, and that upon the latter’s death, the administrator of the estate of Ezra is entitled to the property.

Judgment reversed, judgment for the appellee, and ordered certified to the Probate Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tucker's Will v. Admr. of Tucker's Estate, 63 Vt. 104 (Vt. 1890).

63 Vt. 104 (Tucker's Will v. Admr. of Tucker's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Noyes v. Noyes
9 A.2d 123 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1939)
Bacon, Receiver v. Barber
6 A.2d 9 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1939)
Arnold v. Wells
131 So. 400 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
In Re Walbridge's Will
150 A. 126 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1930)
Payne v. Brown
137 S.E. 921 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)
In Re Carter's Will
134 A. 581 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1926)
In Re Henry's Will
134 A. 632 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1926)
In Re Will of Mansur
127 A. 297 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1925)
In re Robinson's Estate
98 A. 826 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1916)
In re Irish's Will
94 A. 173 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1915)
Hill v. Hill
132 N.W. 738 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1911)
Warner's Admr. v. Bronson
69 A. 655 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1908)
Farney v. Weirich
52 Misc. 245 (New York Supreme Court, 1906)
In re Cowley's Will
97 N.W. 930 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1904)
Burton v. Provost
54 A. 189 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1903)
Jones v. Knappen
63 Vt. 391 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1891)