Tucker's Will v. Admr. of Tucker's Estate

Supreme Court of Vermont

Tucker's Will v. Admr. of Tucker's Estate

21 A. 272, 63 Vt. 104, 25 Am. St. Rep. 743, 63 Vt. 105

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedOctober 15, 1890

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 21 A. 272 (Tucker's Will v. Admr. of Tucker's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tucker's Will v. Admr. of Tucker's Estate, 21 A. 272, 63 Vt. 104, 25 Am. St. Rep. 743, 63 Vt. 105 (Vt. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

TAFT, J.

After certain bequests, the testator gave to his sister, Diana, the use and occupancy of the residue of his estate, during her natural life, and at her decease, directed that it should then be distributed among his lawful heirs. At his death, his father, Ezra Tucker, was living and was his lawful heir. Ezra died before the decease of Diana, and the administrator of his estate claims the residue, as against the appellants, who were the lawful heirs, failing Ezra, at the time of Diana’s death. The words of the will ‘£ amongst my lawful heirs ” had reference to those persons who were the lawful heirs of the testator at the time of his death, not those who might be such at- the time of Diana’s death. No estate will be held contingent unless very decided terms are used in the will, or it is necessary to so hold in order to carry out the other provisions or implications of the will. Weatherhead v. Stoddard, 58 Vt. 623. We think the right'to the residue of the estate, vested at the time of the testator’s death, in his then heir, his father, Ezra Tucker, subject to the life estate of Diana, and that upon the latter’s death, the administrator of the estate of Ezra is entitled to the property.

Judgment reversed, judgment for the appellee, and ordered certified to the Probate Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

TAFT, J.

After certain bequests, the testator gave to his sister, Diana, the use and occupancy of the residue of his estate, during her natural life, and at her decease, directed that it should then be distributed among his lawful heirs. At his death, his father, Ezra Tucker, was living and was his lawful heir. Ezra died before the decease of Diana, and the administrator of his estate claims the residue, as against the appellants, who were the lawful heirs, failing Ezra, at the time of Diana’s death. The words of the will ‘£ amongst my lawful heirs ” had reference to those persons who were the lawful heirs of the testator at the time of his death, not those who might be such at- the time of Diana’s death. No estate will be held contingent unless very decided terms are used in the will, or it is necessary to so hold in order to carry out the other provisions or implications of the will. Weatherhead v. Stoddard, 58 Vt. 623. We think the right'to the residue of the estate, vested at the time of the testator’s death, in his then heir, his father, Ezra Tucker, subject to the life estate of Diana, and that upon the latter’s death, the administrator of the estate of Ezra is entitled to the property.

Judgment reversed, judgment for the appellee, and ordered certified to the Probate Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A. 272, 63 Vt. 104, 25 Am. St. Rep. 743, 63 Vt. 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuckers-will-v-admr-of-tuckers-estate-vt-1890.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack