Tuckerman v. Currier
This text of 54 Colo. 24 (Tuckerman v. Currier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court:
This writ' of error is between the same parties and' involves one phase of the contention covered by case No. 6085, James Tuckerman et al. v. Mary B. Currier et al., decided at [25]*25this term. Its object was to secure a reversal of the order removing the plaintiffs in error from (as the order states)' acting as trustee of the Currier estate and in the appointment of a receiver therefor. This order was made some time prior to the rendition of the final judgment in the case upon the many other questions involved. A supersedeas .was granted. The only separate contention here made is that the order removing the plaintiffs in error and appointing a receiver is interlocutory and not final, and that a writ of error will not lie to review such order, for which alleged .reasons a motion was made to quash the supersedeas and writ and dismiss the action. Upon heáring this motion was denied.
All other questions are covered in the other opinion. For the reasons there stated, the judgment of the trial court in the removal of the plaintiffs in error and in the appointment of the receiver, is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and Remanded.
Decision en banc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 Colo. 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuckerman-v-currier-colo-1912.