Tucker v. United States District Eastern Court Judiciary

280 F. App'x 251
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 2, 2008
DocketNo. 08-6432
StatusPublished

This text of 280 F. App'x 251 (Tucker v. United States District Eastern Court Judiciary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tucker v. United States District Eastern Court Judiciary, 280 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Cornelius Tucker, Jr., filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition in the district court. Prior to any action by the district court, Tucker filed a notice of appeal. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because the district court has not acted on Tucker’s § 2241 petition, there is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order for this court to review. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 F. App'x 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-united-states-district-eastern-court-judiciary-ca4-2008.