Tucker v. United States District Eastern Court Judiciary
This text of 280 F. App'x 251 (Tucker v. United States District Eastern Court Judiciary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cornelius Tucker, Jr., filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition in the district court. Prior to any action by the district court, Tucker filed a notice of appeal. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because the district court has not acted on Tucker’s § 2241 petition, there is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order for this court to review. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
280 F. App'x 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-united-states-district-eastern-court-judiciary-ca4-2008.