Tucker v. Tucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tucker v. Tucker

94 A.D.2d 793, 462 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18260

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 31, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 94 A.D.2d 793 (Tucker v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tucker v. Tucker, 94 A.D.2d 793, 462 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18260 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a divorce action, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kunzeman, J.), dated December 16, 1982, as granted the plaintiff wife’s motion for an examination before trial. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The plaintiff has demonstrated “unusual and unanticipated conditions” warranting further disclosure (see 22 NYCRR 675.7). Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a divorce action, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kunzeman, J.), dated December 16, 1982, as granted the plaintiff wife’s motion for an examination before trial. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The plaintiff has demonstrated “unusual and unanticipated conditions” warranting further disclosure (see 22 NYCRR 675.7). Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 A.D.2d 793, 462 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-tucker-nyappdiv-1983.