Tucker v. Tucker

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Tucker v. Tucker

298 S.E.2d 159, 164 Ga. App. 477, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2841

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 22, 1982

Docket65070

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 298 S.E.2d 159 (Tucker v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tucker v. Tucker, 298 S.E.2d 159, 164 Ga. App. 477, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2841 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Deen, Presiding Judge.

We have no jurisdiction over the subject matter of this appeal, which is a judgment holding appellant in contempt for failure to pay attorney fees made a part of the judgment granting divorce and alimony. Attorney fees are a part of the temporary alimony. Code § 30-202;¹ Coleman v. Coleman, 240 Ga. 417, 420 (240 SE2d 870) (1977); Manuel v. Manuel, 239 Ga. 685, 688 (238 SE2d 328) (1977). As such, it is within the constitutional jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, to which we transfer the case. “Any case carried to the . . . Court of Appeals, which belongs to the class of which the other court has jurisdiction, shall, until otherwise provided by law, be transferred to the... Supreme Court.” Code § 2-3104. We recognize the thrust of the motion to dismiss (see Godbold v. Godbold, 245 Ga. 121 (263 SE2d 440) (1980)) but are without jurisdiction to make a final disposition of the case.

Transferred to the Supreme Court.

Sognier, J., concurs. Pope, J., concurs in the judgment only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deen, Presiding Judge.

We have no jurisdiction over the subject matter of this appeal, which is a judgment holding appellant in contempt for failure to pay attorney fees made a part of the judgment granting divorce and alimony. Attorney fees are a part of the temporary alimony. Code § 30-202;¹ Coleman v. Coleman, 240 Ga. 417, 420 (240 SE2d 870) (1977); Manuel v. Manuel, 239 Ga. 685, 688 (238 SE2d 328) (1977). As such, it is within the constitutional jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, to which we transfer the case. “Any case carried to the . . . Court of Appeals, which belongs to the class of which the other court has jurisdiction, shall, until otherwise provided by law, be transferred to the... Supreme Court.” Code § 2-3104. We recognize the thrust of the motion to dismiss (see Godbold v. Godbold, 245 Ga. 121 (263 SE2d 440) (1980)) but are without jurisdiction to make a final disposition of the case.

Transferred to the Supreme Court.

Sognier, J., concurs. Pope, J., concurs in the judgment only.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

298 S.E.2d 159, 164 Ga. App. 477, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-tucker-gactapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack