Tucker v. Tucker
392 So. 2d 1008, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19394
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 27, 1981·No. No. PP-59·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The trial judge erred when she required appellant to make all future mortgage payments on the marital home, yet allowed appellee to retain her full one-half interest [1009]*1009in the home without providing appellant a credit against appellee’s half of the proceeds if the jointly owned property is sold. Smith v. Smith, 390 So.2d 1223 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Rabino v. Rubino, 372 So.2d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
The judgment appealed as amended by this opinion, is otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tucker v. Tucker, 392 So. 2d 1008, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19394 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
392 So. 2d 1008 (Tucker v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blackburn v. Wissner
257 So. 3d 1190 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Tanner v. Dugan
498 So. 2d 989 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
McClung v. McClung
465 So. 2d 637 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)