Tucker v. Tucker
This text of 392 So. 2d 1008 (Tucker v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial judge erred when she required appellant to make all future mortgage payments on the marital home, yet allowed appellee to retain her full one-half interest [1009]*1009in the home without providing appellant a credit against appellee’s half of the proceeds if the jointly owned property is sold. Smith v. Smith, 390 So.2d 1223 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Rabino v. Rubino, 372 So.2d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
The judgment appealed as amended by this opinion, is otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
392 So. 2d 1008, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-tucker-fladistctapp-1981.