Tucker v. The Bark Sacramento

1 Cal. 403
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1851
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cal. 403 (Tucker v. The Bark Sacramento) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tucker v. The Bark Sacramento, 1 Cal. 403 (Cal. 1851).

Opinion

By the Court,

Bennett, J.

The bark Sacramento was not a vessel used in navigating the waters of this state. Macondray, the only witness who speaks upon the subject, says that the only way in which the bark was so used, was in sailing from the ocean into the harbor of San Francisco. Under precisely the same'state of facts, we held in the case of the Sea Witch, that a vessel which was used in navigating the high seas for its principal occupation was not embraced within the provisions of the Attachment Act of this state, authorizing the issuing of attachments against vessels used in navigating the waters of this state. That case controls this, and the judgment must therefore be reversed.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cal. 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-the-bark-sacramento-cal-1851.