Tucker v. State

89 S.W.2d 787, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 727
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tucker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 123 Tex. Crim. 527
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 15, 1936·No. No. 17848·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing. intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

This prosecution was had under what was commonly called the Dean Law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended). The law has been repealed (Vernon’s Ann. P.C. art. 666 — 49), and no saving clause appears in the repealing statute taking care of pending prosecutions. We have no alternative but to follow the mandate of our statute and reverse and dismiss this prosecution. It is accordingly ordered that the judgment of the trial court be reversed and the prosecution dismissed following Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481, opinion handed down November 27, 1935.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tucker v. State, 89 S.W.2d 787, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 727 (Tex. 1936).

89 S.W.2d 787 (Tucker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meadows v. State
88 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)