Tucker v. State

35 Tex. 113
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 35 Tex. 113 (Tucker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tucker v. State, 35 Tex. 113 (Tex. 1872).

Opinion

Evans, P. J.

The indictment charges that the appellant, having “a living, lawful wife, from whom he had never been divorced, did cohabit and live in adultery with one Lucy Sanders.”

This indictment lacks one of the essential averments of an indictment for adultery, in this, that it does not aver that Lucy Sanders is not the wife of the appellant.

A leading feature of our law is, that no man shall be convicted of an offense until he shall have been plainly and intelligibly charged with it, “in its entire extent.” (2 Bishop C. P., §527; Paschal’s Dig., Art. 2863.)

To support a conviction for adultery, it must be [114]*114charged and proved that one of the parties is married to some person other than the particeps criminis. (Paschal’s Dig., Art. 2028; 2 Bishop C. P., § 11.)

The exception to the indictment should have been sustained; the judgment, therefore, is reversed and the cause dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Teston v. State
63 So. 433 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1913)
State v. Hillman
106 S.W. 603 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Tex. 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-state-tex-1872.