Tucker v. State
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order of the lower court denying appellant’s petition for post conviction relief.
Appellant, Johnnie Tucker, represented by appointed counsel, entered a plea of guilty to murder, with recommendation to mercy, and received, on May 2, 1966, a life sentence. He now seeks relief from the judgment and sentence upon the ground that (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel and (2) his plea of guilty was involuntary.
The lower court, after an evidentiary hearing, found as a fact that appellant freely, voluntarily, and understandingly entered the plea of guilty, after being effectively and competently represented by appointed counsel. These findings [573] are amply supported by the evidence and are accordingly affirmed. White v. State, 255 S. C. 493, 179 S. E. (2d) 906; Sweet v. State, 255 S. C. 293, 178 S. E. (2d) 657.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
190 S.E.2d 23 (Tucker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.