Tucker v. State
This text of 190 S.E.2d 23 (Tucker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order of the lower court denying appellant’s petition for post conviction relief.
Appellant, Johnnie Tucker, represented by appointed counsel, entered a plea of guilty to murder, with recommendation to mercy, and received, on May 2, 1966, a life sentence. He now seeks relief from the judgment and sentence upon the ground that (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel and (2) his plea of guilty was involuntary.
The lower court, after an evidentiary hearing, found as a fact that appellant freely, voluntarily, and understandingly entered the plea of guilty, after being effectively and competently represented by appointed counsel. These findings [573]*573are amply supported by the evidence and are accordingly affirmed. White v. State, 255 S. C. 493, 179 S. E. (2d) 906; Sweet v. State, 255 S. C. 293, 178 S. E. (2d) 657.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 S.E.2d 23, 258 S.C. 572, 1972 S.C. LEXIS 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-state-sc-1972.