Tucker v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Tucker v. State

482 S.W.3d 451, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 87, 2016 WL 519746

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 9, 2016·No. ED 102870·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

DeJuan Tucker (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s, judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs .of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The [452] parties have been provided with a memor randum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

DeJuan Tucker (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s, judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs .of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The [452] parties have been provided with a memor randum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Tucker v. State, 482 S.W.3d 451, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 87, 2016 WL 519746 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

482 S.W.3d 451 (Tucker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.