Tucker v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Tucker v. State

482 S.W.3d 451, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 87, 2016 WL 519746

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 9, 2016

DocketED 102870

StatusPublished

This text of 482 S.W.3d 451 (Tucker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tucker v. State, 482 S.W.3d 451, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 87, 2016 WL 519746 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

DeJuan Tucker (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s, judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs .of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The [452]*452parties have been provided with a memor randum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

DeJuan Tucker (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s, judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs .of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The [452]*452parties have been provided with a memor randum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

482 S.W.3d 451, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 87, 2016 WL 519746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-state-moctapp-2016.