Tucker v. State
This text of 519 S.E.2d 745 (Tucker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William Thomas Tucker appeals from his conviction of aggravated assault, following a jury trial. Tucker enumerates as error the trial court’s failure to charge the jury on reckless conduct and simple battery as lesser included offenses of aggravated assault. Tucker also contends the trial court erred by failing to give a charge on reckless conduct where the evidence supported giving such a charge. We affirm.
At trial, Tucker made no written request to charge on either reckless conduct or simple battery.
[A] written request to charge a lesser included offense must always be given if there is any evidence that the defendant is guilty of the lesser included offense. . . . [However, t]he failure to instruct on a lesser included crime is not error, regardless of whether the evidence would have authorized or demanded such a charge, in the absence of a written request.
(Punctuation omitted.) Taylor v. State, 232 Ga. App. 825, 826 (4) (502 SE2d 540) (1998); Sparks v. State, 232 Ga. App. 179 (1) (501 SE2d 562) (1998). As there was no written request, the trial court did not err by failing to give a charge on the lesser included offense.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
519 S.E.2d 745, 238 Ga. App. 645, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 2630, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-state-gactapp-1999.