Tucker v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Tucker v. State

102 S.E. 880, 25 Ga. App. 196, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 687

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 13, 1920·No. 11289·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. Where a long excerpt from the charge of the court is assigned as error on the ground “ that it was an expression of opinion by the judge presiding, as to what had been proved on the trial of the case,” without stating what the expression was, or pointing out the particular part or parts of the excerpts complained of, and the excerpt as a whole is not subject to the criticism made, the assignment of error is too vague, indefinite, and uncertain to be considered. Roberts v. State, 92 Ga. 451 (3) (17 S. E. 262).

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

1. Where a long excerpt from the charge of the court is assigned as error on the ground “ that it was an expression of opinion by the judge presiding, as to what had been proved on the trial of the case,” without stating what the expression was, or pointing out the particular part or parts of the excerpts complained of, and the excerpt as a whole is not subject to the criticism made, the assignment of error is too vague, indefinite, and uncertain to be considered. Roberts v. State, 92 Ga. 451 (3) (17 S. E. 262).

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Tucker v. State, 102 S.E. 880, 25 Ga. App. 196, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 687 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

102 S.E. 880 (Tucker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related