Tucker v. State

853 So. 2d 604, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13237, 2003 WL 22056585
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 5, 2003·No. No. 5D03-2545·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tucker petitions this court to issue a writ of habeas corpus to permit the late filing of his appeal in a criminal case. He alleges his trial counsel led him to believe an appeal had been timely filed, when in fact it had not been filed. This is a meritorious circumstance for which belated appeals in criminal cases are granted. However, Tucker’s petition is not sworn to as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(3)(F). Accordingly, we deny Tucker’s petition without prejudice to file a sworn petition in compliance with rule 9.141(c)(3)(F).

Petition for Belated Notice of Appeal DENIED Without Prejudice.

SAWAYA, C.J., SHARP, W., and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tucker v. State, 853 So. 2d 604, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13237, 2003 WL 22056585 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

853 So. 2d 604 (Tucker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perreault v. State
853 So. 2d 604 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)