Tucker v. State
582 So. 2d 825, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7610, 1991 WL 136880
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tucker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 576 So. 2d 931 →
Opinion
We affirm the appellant’s convictions but reverse the appellant’s habitual offender sentences and remand for resentencing. In order to be sentenced as a habitual offender under section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1988 Supp.), a defendant must have successive felony convictions. The appellant’s two prior convictions were rendered on the same date, and so they should have been treated as a single offense. Walker v. State, 567 So.2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).
Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tucker v. State, 582 So. 2d 825, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7610, 1991 WL 136880 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
582 So. 2d 825 (Tucker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walker v. State
567 So. 2d 546 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)