Tucker v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Tucker v. State

952 S.W.2d 677, 330 Ark. 434

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedOctober 30, 1997

DocketCR 97-1213

StatusPublished

This text of 952 S.W.2d 677 (Tucker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tucker v. State, 952 S.W.2d 677, 330 Ark. 434 (Ark. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Dennis Cornell Tucker, by his attorney, G.B.“Bing” Colvin, III, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the transcript was tendered late due to an error on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam order dated February 5, 1979. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Dennis Cornell Tucker, by his attorney, G.B.“Bing” Colvin, III, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the transcript was tendered late due to an error on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam order dated February 5, 1979. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

952 S.W.2d 677, 330 Ark. 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-state-ark-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack