Home/Alabama Court of Appeals/Tucker v. State

Tucker v. State

157 So. 2d 229, 42 Ala. App. 174, 1963 Ala. App. LEXIS 227
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 18, 1963
Docket3 Div. 147
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 157 So. 2d 229 (Tucker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tucker v. State, 157 So. 2d 229, 42 Ala. App. 174, 1963 Ala. App. LEXIS 227 (Ala. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

This is an appeal on the record proper from a judgment based on a verdict of guilty on an indictment for grand larceny of an automobile.

On arraignment it affirmatively appears that the defendant was without counsel. No waiver appears. Under Hamilton v. State, 273 Ala. 504, 142 So.2d 868, Hamilton v. Alabama, 368 U.S. 52, 82 S.Ct. 157, 7 L.Ed.2d 114, and Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 [175]*175(March 15, 1963), we consider the judgment below is required to be reversed and the cause there remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Storey v. State
141 So. 3d 1125 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2013)
Mayola v. State
337 So. 2d 105 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1976)
Dillard v. State
215 So. 2d 464 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1968)
Irvin v. State
203 So. 2d 283 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1967)
Frank M. Williams v. State of Alabama
341 F.2d 777 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)
Tucker v. State
157 So. 2d 229 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 So. 2d 229, 42 Ala. App. 174, 1963 Ala. App. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-state-alactapp-1963.