Tucker v. Social Security Administration
This text of Tucker v. Social Security Administration (Tucker v. Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
ASHLEY D. TUCKER PLAINTIFF
v. No. 4:21-cv-141-DPM
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner Social Security Administration DEFENDANT
ORDER The Government hasn’t objected to Tucker’s motion for an award of fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The hours and fees are reasonable. The unopposed motion, Doc. 23, is therefore granted. The Court awards a reasonable attorney’s fee of $6,878.60, payable directly to Tucker. Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 591 (2010). The check should be mailed to Tucker's lawyer. So Ordered. ATID] a 4A. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 13 February 2023
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tucker v. Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-social-security-administration-ared-2023.