Tucker v. Social Security Administration

E.D. Arkansas

Tucker v. Social Security Administration

District Court, E.D. Arkansas·Decided February 13, 2023·No. 4:21-cv-00141·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION

ASHLEY D. TUCKER PLAINTIFF

v. No. 4:21-cv-141-DPM

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner Social Security Administration DEFENDANT

ORDER The Government hasn’t objected to Tucker’s motion for an award of fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The hours and fees are reasonable. The unopposed motion, Doc. 23, is therefore granted. The Court awards a reasonable attorney’s fee of $6,878.60, payable directly to Tucker. Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 591 (2010). The check should be mailed to Tucker's lawyer. So Ordered. ATID] a 4A. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 13 February 2023

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION

ASHLEY D. TUCKER PLAINTIFF

v. No. 4:21-cv-141-DPM

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner Social Security Administration DEFENDANT

ORDER The Government hasn’t objected to Tucker’s motion for an award of fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The hours and fees are reasonable. The unopposed motion, Doc. 23, is therefore granted. The Court awards a reasonable attorney’s fee of $6,878.60, payable directly to Tucker. Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 591 (2010). The check should be mailed to Tucker's lawyer. So Ordered. ATID] a 4A. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 13 February 2023

Tucker v. Social Security Administration, (E.D. Ark. 2023).

Pincite

Tucker v. Social Security Administration (Tucker v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related