Tucker v. Shorter
This text of 17 Ga. 620 (Tucker v. Shorter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
All this may be true; but it is not properly set forth in this petition. It is there alleged, that “as commissioners,” &c. they contracted and covenanted, &c. This was their character as public agents, and they are not, by the declaration, charged as being liable, because having in possession a private fund, for the appropriation of which they are responsible. If ••the case had been so framed, and it had been alleged, that in consideration of this they had bound themselves personally, ■and the charge were sustained by proof, then a recovery against them individually, perhaps, might be put upon this .ground. But the declaration does not show this, and the Court below was right in dismissing it.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 Ga. 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-shorter-ga-1855.