Tucker v. Royal Industrial Bank
This text of 270 A.D. 1044 (Tucker v. Royal Industrial Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action to recover damages because of an alleged fraudulent assignment of a chattel mortgage. Appeal by plaintiff from an order granting defendants’ motion to set aside the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff and granting a new trial on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of evidence. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Molan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 A.D. 1044, 63 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-royal-industrial-bank-nyappdiv-1946.