Tucker v. Rogers

134 So. 388, 172 La. 445, 1931 La. LEXIS 1706
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 30, 1931
DocketNo. 28255.
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 134 So. 388 (Tucker v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tucker v. Rogers, 134 So. 388, 172 La. 445, 1931 La. LEXIS 1706 (La. 1931).

Opinion

ST. PAUL, J.

Defendant authorized one S. J. Derbes, a real estate broker, to sell for his account ten certain lots of ground for a net price of $4,-500 and retain all above that amount for his commission.

Derbes approached plaintiff, another real estate broker, and arranged to sell him the lots for $4,750. It was agreed, however, that plaintiff and Derbes were to split the commission of $250. '

Thereupon plaintiff addresses to himself as “Selling Agent” an offer to purchase the property, signed by himself as “Agent for client, Buyer”; which offer he, “Selling Agent,” submitted to Derbes, as “Listing Agent,” and was accepted by defendant as “Owner.”

When defendant learned that plaintiff was not purchasing for “a client,” but for himself, defendant repudiated the contract and sold the property to another person. Whereupon plaintiff sued defendant for damages equal to the price at which defendant had promised to sell and that at which plaintiff could have sold.

The trial judge rejected plaintiff’s demand, and plaintiff appeals.

We think the judgment appealed from is correct. The promise of sale never was completed. The offer of sale was to all intents and purposes made to Derbes as “Listing Agent,” and offered to place in his hands one-tenth of the purchase price, or $475. When plaintiff withheld out of this deposit, as he did, one-half the commission (or $125), he deposited with Derbes only $350, or less than the 10 per cent, of the purchase price. Hence the contract was not completed. State ex rel. Bond v. Register of Conveyances, 162 La. 362, 110 So. 559. '

Decree.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.

O’NIELL, O. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dane & Northrop v. Rittiner
78 So. 2d 178 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1955)
Bayon v. Pettingill
77 So. 2d 202 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1955)
Reuther v. Bergeron
59 So. 2d 392 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1952)
Samuelson v. Bosk
53 So. 2d 239 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1951)
In Re Industrial Homestead Ass'n
198 So. 528 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 So. 388, 172 La. 445, 1931 La. LEXIS 1706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-rogers-la-1931.