Tucker v. R.M. Tours

958 A.2d 496, 598 Pa. 543, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1739
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 8, 2008·No. Appeal No. 123 EAL 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

May a trial court that has received a timely but unclear Statement of Errors Complained of on Appeal request a second, clearer Statement?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tucker v. R.M. Tours, 958 A.2d 496, 598 Pa. 543, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1739 (Pa. 2008).

958 A.2d 496 (Tucker v. R.M. Tours) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tucker v. R.M. Tours
977 A.2d 1170 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)